APRIL BUSINESS RATES CREDITS
Case reference FOI2026/01234
Received 2 April 2026
Published 8 April 2026
Request
Response
Please be advised that this information is exempt from disclosure as it may cause credit balances to be fraudulently obtained. Please see details on the applicable exemption below.
Section 31 of the FOI Act - Prevention of Crime
We believe that business rates accounts credit balance information is exempt from disclosure in accordance with section 31(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act because disclosure would be likely to:
- Prejudice the prevention of crime by disclosing information which would enable potential fraudsters to use the information to identify companies/individuals entitled to claim credits on their accounts. Once such details have been identified, this would open up a number of avenues for fraudsters to seek to obtain funds.
The S31 exemption is, however, a qualified exemption and the duty to disclose the requested information arises unless, in all the circumstances, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.
The public interest in the information being disclosed
The Council recognises that there is a legitimate public interest in the disclosure of information which facilitates the accountability and transparency of public bodies for decisions taken by them. Disclosure of the requested information may increase openness and transparency in relation to the Council's collection of taxes and the management of finances. It would also provide the public with more information about the amounts of unclaimed business rates/council tax credits.
The public interest in maintaining the exemption
We believe there is a strong public interest in ensuring that monies from the public purse, such as rebates on council tax/business rates accounts, are not fraudulently claimed and also a public interest in not making it easier for fraud to be committed. Disclosure of the requested information would result in the need to implement disproportionate steps and additional expense to the public purse to counter an increased fraud risk that does not exist at present. The Council does not consider this to be in the public interest. The Council has also considered the cost consequences of a successful fraudulent claim, including the costs incurred in paying out to the fraudster, remaining liable to the legitimate claimant for an equivalent amount, raising the prospect of paying out twice; and being faced with the cost (legal and incurrence of internal management time) of seeking to recover the funds incorrectly paid to the fraudster. In the Council's view, it would not be in the public interest to be exposed to such potential costs and expenses, given that this would be funded from the public purse.
Having undertaken the balancing exercise, the Council has concluded that the public interest lies in favour of maintaining the exemption and withholding the information. In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act section 17, this email acts as a Refusal Notice.
For your information - the Council also took in to consideration a recent ICO decision notice regarding a request of a similar nature, where the Commissioner's decision was that the authority had correctly engaged the section 31(1)(a) exemption - https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2017/2172507/fs50643256.pdf
Documents
This is Portsmouth City Council's response to a freedom of information (FOI) or environmental information regulations (EIR) request.